In Hermantown, data centers roil local politics



A woman with a clipboard speaks to a man at his front door.

On a chilly spring evening, Brea Schminski did what she’s been doing quite often recently: knocking on doors on a quiet street in Hermantown, Minn., asking people to sign a petition.

She stopped at Graham Sparkman's house just as he was making dinner.

“We're just trying to get signatures to petition for a charter commission. It would just provide more transparency for constituents,” she explained to him.

Sparkman is one of nearly 800 Hermantown residents who signed this petition that a judge approved earlier this week. In June, the judge will appoint seven Hermantown residents to form a charter commission. They’ll write a new charter for the city — essentially a city constitution — and the document will be put before voters to either approve or reject it on election day in November.

Schminski got involved because she opposes construction of Google’s hyperscale data center here, a project that’s facing significant pushback from local residents and environmental groups.

A wide shot of a woman walking down a residential street.
Brea Schminski walks a Hermantown neighborhood, gathering signatures for a petition to create a charter commission. Schminski is opposed to a proposed data center in Hermantown, and believes a city charter will bring more transparency to city actions. Seen April 30.
Catharine Richert | MPR News

She's worried the data center will drain resources and disrupt the natural beauty of the area — concerns echoed in other communities where hyperscale data centers have been proposed.

But Schminski is also troubled that city officials signed non-disclosure agreements with the project's developer that prevented them from discussing certain details about the proposed data center publicly.

A city charter could prohibit city officials from signing future NDAs, she said.

“It gives more transparency. The NDAs could be off the table,” said Schminski. “I don't think they should be signing them for any project. [City officials are] there for us, so they shouldn't be hiding anything."

A lack of transparency

The proposed Hermantown data center is one of a dozen such hyperscale projects around Minnesota. Two lawsuits have also been filed to try to prevent construction of the Hermantown data center from moving forward.

And earlier this month, opponents in the community earned at least a short-term win when the city council delayed a decision on whether to provide Google with a $80 million tax break in exchange for building the $2 billion facility.

The Hermantown project still needs to clear other hurdles, including environmental review and additional permits.

A man holding a paper speaks to a dining table full of people.
Greg Rosenberg led an effort this spring to create a charter commission — a judge appointed group that will write a charter for the city. He pitched the idea to a group of Hermantown residents on May 1.
Catharine Richert | MPR News

But some residents are thinking beyond the potential construction of the data center about how to improve the openness and transparency of local government.

And that includes Greg Rosenberg. He led the petition effort. As a cybersecurity expert, he uses artificial intelligence often, which is what the data center would empower, and he's not opposed to data centers either.

But he is opposed to the discrete way the project was initially planned and how Hermantown residents eventually learned about the proposed data center.

“Most people found out not from the city but through these random articles and people talking to one another,” he said. “It became clear very early on that there was some level of opacity with this stuff."

Rosenberg quickly discovered that Hermantown's current governance structure gives residents little recourse.

“We don't have provisions for recall. There's no ability to put something on the ballot, like a referendum. There really were no ethical requirements like conflicts of interest or disclosure,” he said.

He said depending on how it’s written, a city charter could change all of that.

Taking constituent concerns seriously

Hermantown officials declined interview requests for this story, and data center tenant Google stopped responding to inquiries from MPR News after previously saying they would make someone available for an interview.

But city officials refute the allegation that they have not been listening to constituent concerns.

“I've heard a lot of folks mentioning we're not listening. I can definitely tell you we are,” city council member Andy Hjelle told an overflowing audience at a recent meeting. “We’re getting all the information we can and trying to make the best educated decision that we can."

Hermantown data center vote May 2026
Dave Lislegard, executive director of Jobs for Minnesotans, testified in support of a proposed Google data center at the Hermantown City Council meeting on May 4.
Dan Kraker | MPR News

And while these meetings have drawn large crowds of opponents, they’ve drawn supporters, too.

For instance, trade groups support the project because of Google’s promised job creation; the company promises the project would create up to 2,000 construction jobs and 100 long-term jobs.

At a recent city council meeting, Jack Carlson, a Hermantown resident and president of the Duluth Building and Construction Trades Council, said that those jobs would allow construction workers to stay close to home rather than travel for work.

Hermantown data center vote May 2026
Labor and business supporters wearing green shirts and data center opponents in red packed the Hermantown city council chambers on May 4 to weigh in on proposed tax and development agreements with Google over a proposed data center.
Dan Kraker | MPR News

“The ability for the Duluth building trades [workers] to stay home and eat dinners with their family and attend the events they potentially would miss is an amazing opportunity,” he said.

Others point out the project could expand the city’s tax base and raise millions in funding for the local school district, and Google promises to pay the cost of the project’s infrastructure.

Running for city council

Resident Emma Richtman doesn’t buy those promises. She said she never really followed local politics — until she learned about the data center.

“I just was gob smacked at the size and scale of this data center that they wanted to put two and a half miles from my house in the middle of a rural residential area,” she said. “And it just immediately floored me that this cannot happen. So that's when I started attending city council meetings.”

A portrait of a woman in yellow sitting on a porch step.
Emma Richtman sits on the front porch of her Hermantown home. Her city council run this fall was prompted by opposition to a proposed data center near her home. Seen April 30.
Catharine Richert | MPR News

Since then, she's talked to state lawmakers and she's poured over project documents. Now, Richtman is running for city council.

“If this goes through, this is going to impact my family's longevity and my neighbor's longevity and their health and well-being,” she said. “I'm finding my voice, because my voice and my neighbor's voices deserve to be heard."



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews



Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-La., takes questions at a news conference at the U.S. Capitol on April 21, 2026.

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-La., takes questions at a news conference at the U.S. Capitol on April 21, 2026.
Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-La., takes questions at a news conference at the U.S. Capitol on April 21.
J. Scott Applewhite | AP

The House of Representatives voted Thursday to reopen most of the Department of Homeland Security, ending the longest agency shutdown in U.S. history.

The House passed a bill funding DHS, minus dollars for Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection. The measure passed by voice vote on what was the 76th day of the shutdown.

Democrats refused to back funding for many of the agency's immigration functions in an unsuccessful effort to secure reforms including body-worn cameras and broad restrictions on face coverings after federal law enforcement killed two American citizens in Minnesota earlier this year.

The Senate, led by Republican Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., unanimously advanced this funding legislation in March. At the time, Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., referred to the proposal as "a joke" and refused to bring it up for a vote. Many members of the House Republican conference refused to fund the agency in a piecemeal fashion and did not want to negotiate over reforms to immigration enforcement operations.

On April 1, Johnson reversed course. He announced the funding bill would be voted on "in the coming days." More than four weeks later, he finally made good on that commitment.

In an effort to appease his hardline members, Johnson waited to bring the Senate's proposal to a vote until that chamber's Republicans started the arcane procedural process, known as reconciliation, to fund all of DHS — including Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) — for the remainder of Trump's term without any backing from Democrats.

The funding bill comes as Secretary of Homeland Security Markwayne Mullin warned the agency was close to running out of funds to pay staff.

"We have reached all the emergency funds we can reach into," Mullin told Fox News on Friday. "I am completely out of the slush fund, I have no place to move at the end of the month."

Mullin said the agency was relying on appropriated funds from last year's One Big Beautiful Bill, which allocated more than $150 billion to DHS on top of its regular annual appropriations funding.

President Donald Trump signed a memo this month authorizing DHS to use some of the money from that legislation to fund the department's operations — potentially infringing on the powers granted to Congress by the Constitution to direct how taxpayer money is spent.

Copyright 2026, NPR



Source link