From Intrapreneur to Redefining Security


We are not retiring that work. The articles published under Intrapreneur remain part of our archive, fully accessible, and now findable under the Intrapreneur tag. What is changing is the editorial frame.

Beginning today, the Intrapreneur department is becoming Redefining Security.

Why the shift

The conditions our movement is responding to have changed. The decade ahead will not be defined primarily by the question of whether incumbents can be persuaded to change from within — though that question still matters. It will be defined by whether civilization can build genuine resilience against a cascade of intersecting risks: climate destabilization, public-health fragility, economic precarity, democratic erosion, and the unraveling of the social fabric that binds communities to one another.

Each of those is, properly understood, a security question. And each has been answered for far too long with the same paradigm: walls higher, weapons more lethal, fortresses more isolated, defense more concentrated. That paradigm has produced what it was designed to produce — vast spending, narrow benefit, persistent vulnerability. It has not produced safety.

What is producing safety, where it is being produced, is something different. It is the slow, structural work of building distributed capacity instead of concentrated force. It is investment in the root conditions — ecological stability, community cohesion, public-health infrastructure, economic equity, democratic transparency — rather than in reaction to symptoms. It is the recognition that mutualism outperforms militarization at the civilizational scale we now inhabit. 

This is the territory Redefining Security will cover. Not security as it has been imagined, but security as it is being practiced by impact entrepreneurs, communities, and capital that have stopped asking how to wall off harm and started asking how to build the foundations that make harm rarer in the first place.

What you’ll find here

Redefining Security will run reportage, analysis, and case studies on:

  • Climate-resilient infrastructure and the practitioners building it at municipal, regional, and bioregional scale.
  • Public-health systems designed for prevention rather than only response.
  • Economic models — cooperative, mutualist, place-based — that produce stability through distribution rather than extraction.
  • Democratic infrastructure that maintains the trust without which no other security holds.
  • Community cohesion and the social bonds that, in every disaster of the past decade, have proven more decisive than any institution.

The pieces we publish here will share a thesis: that fortress thinking, in a networked and ecologically interdependent age, is not just morally inadequate. It is strategically inadequate. The future belongs to those who can build foundations.

What stays the same

The intrapreneur as a figure has not disappeared from the impact economy and will continue to appear in our pages — in coverage of corporate transformation, supply-chain resilience, ESG integrity, and the structural innovations happening inside institutions that recognize their old extractive operating systems will not survive the century. Those stories now appear under the Intrapreneur tag, threaded across the departments where they best belong.

What is new is that the frame of intrapreneurship — change from within incumbents — is no longer adequate as a department on its own. The civilizational moment demands a wider lens. Redefining Security is that lens.

We’re glad to have you reading.

The Editors



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews



Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-La., takes questions at a news conference at the U.S. Capitol on April 21, 2026.

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-La., takes questions at a news conference at the U.S. Capitol on April 21, 2026.
Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-La., takes questions at a news conference at the U.S. Capitol on April 21.
J. Scott Applewhite | AP

The House of Representatives voted Thursday to reopen most of the Department of Homeland Security, ending the longest agency shutdown in U.S. history.

The House passed a bill funding DHS, minus dollars for Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection. The measure passed by voice vote on what was the 76th day of the shutdown.

Democrats refused to back funding for many of the agency's immigration functions in an unsuccessful effort to secure reforms including body-worn cameras and broad restrictions on face coverings after federal law enforcement killed two American citizens in Minnesota earlier this year.

The Senate, led by Republican Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., unanimously advanced this funding legislation in March. At the time, Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., referred to the proposal as "a joke" and refused to bring it up for a vote. Many members of the House Republican conference refused to fund the agency in a piecemeal fashion and did not want to negotiate over reforms to immigration enforcement operations.

On April 1, Johnson reversed course. He announced the funding bill would be voted on "in the coming days." More than four weeks later, he finally made good on that commitment.

In an effort to appease his hardline members, Johnson waited to bring the Senate's proposal to a vote until that chamber's Republicans started the arcane procedural process, known as reconciliation, to fund all of DHS — including Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) — for the remainder of Trump's term without any backing from Democrats.

The funding bill comes as Secretary of Homeland Security Markwayne Mullin warned the agency was close to running out of funds to pay staff.

"We have reached all the emergency funds we can reach into," Mullin told Fox News on Friday. "I am completely out of the slush fund, I have no place to move at the end of the month."

Mullin said the agency was relying on appropriated funds from last year's One Big Beautiful Bill, which allocated more than $150 billion to DHS on top of its regular annual appropriations funding.

President Donald Trump signed a memo this month authorizing DHS to use some of the money from that legislation to fund the department's operations — potentially infringing on the powers granted to Congress by the Constitution to direct how taxpayer money is spent.

Copyright 2026, NPR



Source link